Related Articles
SpaceX was forced to delay the planned early Wednesday launch of a Falcon 9 rocket carrying a commercially built robotic moon lander after engineers noted unusual temperature readings prior to loading the probe with liquid methane fuel.
The company said the launch team planned to make another attempt Thursday, at 1:05 a.m. EST, to send Intuitive Machines’ Odysseus lander toward touchdown near the moon’s south pole. A third launch opportunity is available Friday if needed, but if it’s not off the ground by then, the flight will slip into March.
As long as it gets off this week, however, the Odysseus lander, nicknamed “Odie,” will still land on Feb. 22, about 186 miles from the moon’s south pole, using a high-power 3D-printed main engine burning liquid oxygen and methane propellants, a first for a deep space mission.
SpaceX carried out extensive modifications to cool and route the cryogenic propellants into the Falcon 9’s nose fairing and then into the lander’s tanks during the rocket’s countdown. Dress rehearsals were staged late last week to verify the system would work as required and while minor snags were noted, company officials said there were no showstoppers.
But the countdown Tuesday night was halted during the lander fueling process.
“Standing down from tonight’s attempt due to off-nominal methane temperatures prior to stepping into methane load,” SpaceX said in a post on X.
Whenever it takes off, the flight will follow the ill-fated Jan. 8 launch of another commercial moon lander — Peregrine — built by Pittsburg-based Astrobotic that suffered a propulsion system malfunction shortly after takeoff. The mishap derailed what would have been the first U.S. moon landing since the Apollo program’s final flight more than 50 years ago.
Odysseus-builder Intuitive Machines of Houston now hopes to claim that honor.
“It is a profoundly humbling moment for all of us at Intuitive Machines,” Trent Martin, the company’s space systems vice president, said at a pre-launch news conference earlier Tuesday. “The opportunity to return the United States to the moon for the first time since 1972 is a feat of engineering that demands a hunger to explore.”
“We’re not overlooking the challenges that lie ahead,” Martin added. “Any venture into uncharted territory carries risk, yet this willingness to embrace the risk and push beyond our comfort zones propels us forward and drives innovation…Now let’s go make history.”
Odysseus carries six NASA instruments and another six commercial payloads, including sculptures, proof-of-concept cloud storage technology, an astronomical telescope and a student-built camera package that will drop to the surface ahead of the lander to photograph its final descent.
Among the NASA experiments is an instrument to study the charged particle environment at the moon’s surface, another that will test navigation technologies and downward-facing stereo cameras designed to photograph how the lander’s engine exhaust disrupts the soil at the landing site.
Also on board: an innovative sensor that will use radio waves to accurately determine how much cryogenic propellant is left in a tank in the weightless environment of space, technology that is expected to prove useful for downstream moon missions and other deep space voyages.
The Falcon 9 is expected to release the lander on a trajectory to the moon 48 minutes after liftoff. But getting into lunar orbit and down to the surface will be up to Odysseus and the Intuitive Machines flight control team in Houston.
A key milestone is expected 18 hours after launch when the lander’s main engine is test-fired, or commissioned, to help controllers calibrate its performance in space. After that, up to three trajectory correction maneuvers are planned to fine-tune its course to the moon.
It will take Odysseus seven to eight days to reach its target. Flying behind the moon and out of contact with flight controllers, the lander’s main engine will have to fire for seven minutes “in the blind” to put the craft into a 62-mile-high circular orbit carrying it over the landing site at 80 degrees south latitude.
During 12 trips around the moon, flight controllers will check out the lander’s systems before beginning the final descent to relatively flat terrain near a crater known as Malapert A. To ensure a safe landing, the main engine will have to reduce the spacecraft’s velocity by some 4,000 mph.
The descent will begin with a small rocket firing 75 minutes before touchdown to drop the low point of the orbit to an altitude of about 6 miles. The spacecraft then will coast for about an hour before the engine re-ignites to begin the powered descent to the surface.
Descending through an altitude of about 18 miles, Odysseus will flip from a horizontal to a vertical orientation, dropping at just under 4 mph. As the spacecraft drops below 100 feet, the “EagleCam” imaging system, built by students at Embry-Riddle University, will fall away and attempt to photograph the lander’s final descent from the side.
By the time Odysseus reaches 33 feet above the surface, the main engine will have throttled down to the planned landing velocity of just 2.2 mph — walking speed for senior citizens.
Intuitive Machines says it will take flight controllers about 15 seconds to verify touchdown. Data recorded during the descent, including photos from the lander’s plume observation cameras and the deployed EagleCam, will be relayed back to Earth later.
Odysseus and its experiments are expected to operate for about a week before the sun sets at the landing site, cutting off solar power. The spacecraft is not designed to survive the extremely low temperatures of the two-week lunar night.
“Landing on the moon is really difficult to do,” said Joel Kearns, NASA’s deputy associate administrator for exploration. “I think people have seen different attempts at that over the last year, and it’s really tough. There’s no air on the moon, you can’t use parachutes, you have to use rockets (to decelerate) all the way down.”
“Intuitive Machines have picked some really innovative techniques that they’re (using) in their propulsion system,” Kearns said. “They’ve got some really neat things they’re going to demonstrate. That means they’re doing a lot of things for the first time.”
Only the U.S., Russia, China, India and Japan have successfully put landers on the surface of the moon, and Japan’s membership in that exclusive club comes with an asterisk: its “SLIM” lander tipped over on touchdown Jan. 19 and failed to achieve all of the mission’s objectives.
Three privately funded moon landers were launched between 2019 and this past January, one from an Israeli non-profit, one from a Japanese company and Astrobotic’s Peregrine. All three failed.
Peregrine and Odysseus were both funded in part by NASA’s Commercial Lunar Payload Services program, or CLPS (pronounced “clips”), designed to encourage private industry to develop transportation capabilities that NASA can then use to transport payloads to the moon.
The agency’s goal is to help kickstart the development of new technologies and to collect data that will be needed by Artemis astronauts planning to land near the moon’s south pole later this decade.
The agency spent about $108 million for its part in the Peregrine mission and another $129 million for the Odysseus instruments and transportation to the moon.
“These aren’t NASA missions, they’re commercial missions,” said Susan Lederer, CLPS project scientist at the Johnson Space Center. “These commercial companies will be bringing our instruments along for the ride, enabling our investigations by providing power, data and [communications] to us.
“With the commercial industry comes a competitive environment, which means that our investment up front ultimately gets far more for far less. So instead of one mission in a decade, it allows for more like 10 commercial missions to the moon in a decade.”
But the lower cost of CLPS mission brings with it higher risks. Lessons learned from Peregrine will be funneled into the development of the company’s next lander, scheduled for launch late this year, and other CLPS missions.
“We’ll learn from what doesn’t work, testing many technologies, conducting experiments at a lower cost and significantly faster than traditional NASA mission,” Lederer said. “This will allow us to prepare for Artemis more efficiently.”
